CAI
Clinical Asset Index
by VOS Supply Group
Verify
Home / Equipment Library / Compare

Philips CX50 vs Sonosite M-Turbo

Side-by-side used-pricing comparison. Same category, so direct comparison is meaningful.

MetricPhilips CX50Sonosite M-Turbo
ManufacturerPhilipsSonosite
CategoryUltrasoundUltrasound
Complete-system median$14,808$4,380
Complete-system comps1613
p25 – p75 range (complete system)$11,250 – $22,001$3,500 – $5,000
Min – max observed$6,762 – $30,000$2,100 – $6,495
Active listings201165
Sources23
CoverageGOODSTRONG
On observed listings alone, the Philips CX50 complete-system median is $14,808 (16 comps), while the Sonosite M-Turbo median is $4,380 (13 comps). That's a 238% price difference between the two on the secondary market.
Related models
Philips IE33Philips Epiq 7Mindray DC-80Mindray DP-50Canon Aplio 500
FAQ
Is the Philips CX50 or Sonosite M-Turbo cheaper used?
On observed listings, the Sonosite M-Turbo has the lower complete-system median ($14,808 vs $4,380).
What is the used price difference between the Philips CX50 and Sonosite M-Turbo?
About 238% on the secondary market, based on 16 and 13 complete-system comps respectively.

How these medians are computed → · Glossary →